The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $250.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 47% cheaper – $279.00 vs $529.00
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, $
$529
52%
Value, $/FPS
$6.08/FPS
90%
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$399.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$486.99
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
33%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
33%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
256.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
107.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
255.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
8.186 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |