In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 80 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 483% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 70 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 483% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jun 27, 2017
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Jun 27th, 2017
Average FPS
12 FPS
17%
Min 1% FPS
9 FPS
17%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Jun 27th, 2017
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
71.04 GPixel/s
26%
Texture Fillrate
118.4 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
3.789 TFLOPS
22%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q Jun 27th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 27th, 2017 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
