The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $88.40 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 42% cheaper – $119.99 vs $208.39
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
75%
Min 1% FPS
25
68%
Price, $
$208.39
57%
Value, $/FPS
$3.78/FPS
43%
Buy on Amazon
$208.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$486.18
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$396.29
In Stock
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
90%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
30%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 44.54 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 66.82 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.138 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
