In Deathloop, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is quite a bit slower than the Arc A770. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $160 cheaper!
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Up to 57% cheaper – $119.98 vs $279.99
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Deathloop – $1.55 vs $2.05/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 77% faster in Deathloop – 136 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 77% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Deathloop FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
77 FPS
57%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
58%
Price, $
$119.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
42%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
76%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
11%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Oct 25th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
