The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Feb 1st, 2017
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
85%
Min 1% FPS
20
80%
Price, $
$193.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$193.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$82.99
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Feb 1st, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
51.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
77.76 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.488 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
37%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
49%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
51.84 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
77.76 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
2.488 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
