The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is better in every way
Advantages of the RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 70 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
57
59%
Min 1% FPS
25
47%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, $
$913.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
40%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
33%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
17%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
102.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
187.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Workstation Ada (x000A) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 102.2 GPixel/s |
61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 187.4 GTexel/s |
1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12 TFLOPS |