The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 176 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
50%
Min 1% FPS
25
42%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, $
$1819.67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
18%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |
