The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 75 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
82%
Min 1% FPS
25
78%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$199.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
35%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
96%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
