Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6800 is 1252 days newer than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6800 - 75 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6800
- Performs up to 194% better in Starfield than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q - 53 vs 18 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q - 32 vs 4 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$73.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$3890
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $3,890 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
11%
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro W6800 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $2249 |
None | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 32 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1152 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2075 MHz |
1291 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2320 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |