The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 75 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
55%
Min 1% FPS
25
46%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
34%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
23%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
