In Atomfall, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is much faster than the GeForce 9800 GTX. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Up to 357% faster in Atomfall – 32 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 357% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2018 vs Mar 28, 2008
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 75 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
GeForce 9800 GTX
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce 9800 GTX: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
32 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
24 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce 9800 GTX: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce 9800 GTX: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 9800 GTX
Mar 28th, 2008
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
70.4 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
26%
Texture Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
432.1 GFLOPS
22%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q Jan 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 9800 GTX Mar 28th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Released | Mar 28th, 2008 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 9 (9800) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
