In Ready or Not, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is much slower than the Arc A730M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 75 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 6% less energy
Arc A730M
- Up to 165% faster in Ready or Not – 220 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 165% faster in Ready or Not
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory
Ready or Not FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A730M: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
83 FPS
38%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
43%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A730M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A730M: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
16%
Arc A730M
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
196.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
393.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.6 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q Jan 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7 Mobile) |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
75W | Power Consumption | 80W |
