In The Last of Us Part I, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is much slower than the Arc A350. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
No clear advantages
Arc A350
- Up to 600% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 7 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 600% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 25 vs 75 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A350: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
1 FPS
14%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
50%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A350: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A350: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
90%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
65%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
65%
Arc A350
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
48 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
96 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.072 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q Jan 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2018 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 25 W |
