The GeForce GT 755M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 755M
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 50 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 755M
Jun 25th, 2013
Average FPS
42
86%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 755M
Jun 25th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
83%
Pixel Fillrate
8.16 GPixel/s
46%
Texture Fillrate
32.64 GTexel/s
53%
FP32
783.4 GFLOPS
40%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 755M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 25th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
8.16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
32.64 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
783.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |