In Deathloop, the GeForce GT 755M is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 755M
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 65% faster in Deathloop – 81 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 65% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jun 25, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 30 vs 50 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Deathloop FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 755M vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
81 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 755M vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 755M vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 755M
Jun 25th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
8.16 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
32.64 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
783.4 GFLOPS
29%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 755M Jun 25th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 25th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 700M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 50W | Power Consumption | 30W |
