The GeForce GT 735M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 735M
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 33 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce GT 735M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 735M
Apr 1st, 2013
Average FPS
44
45%
Min 1% FPS
15
28%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, $
$692.84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.14/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$692.84
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$739.99
In Stock
GeForce GT 735M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 735M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 735M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 735M
Apr 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
5.024 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
20.1 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
482.3 GFLOPS
4%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
102.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
187.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 735M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | Workstation Ada (x000A) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
5.024 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 102.2 GPixel/s |
20.1 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 187.4 GTexel/s |
482.3 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12 TFLOPS |