The GeForce GT 540M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 540M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 35 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
23%
Min 1% FPS
14
13%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$999.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.88/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
2.688 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
10.75 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
258 GFLOPS
1%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 540M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.688 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 10.75 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 258 GFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
