The GeForce GT 520M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520M
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 12 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
46%
Min 1% FPS
14
31%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
1.344 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
5.376 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
129 GFLOPS
1%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
12 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.344 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 5.376 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 129 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
