The GeForce GT 520M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520M
- Consumes up to 98% less energy – 12 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
16%
Min 1% FPS
14
8%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$4177.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.26/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$4,177.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,699.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,399.95
In Stock
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
1.344 GPixel/s
0%
Texture Fillrate
5.376 GTexel/s
0%
FP32
129 GFLOPS
0%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
12 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.344 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 5.376 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 129 GFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
