The GeForce GT 520 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $388.95 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520
- Up to 82% cheaper – $84.00 vs $472.95
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 29 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
17%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
41%
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
1%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
$59.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
29 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.62 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 6.48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 155.5 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
