The GeForce GT 520 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 4100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $104.03 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520
- Up to 87% cheaper – $15.99 vs $120.02
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 29 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Average FPS
39
80%
Min 1% FPS
14
67%
Price, $
$15.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$120.02
13%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
17%
GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
6%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
$59.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
29 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.62 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.22 GPixel/s |
| 6.48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 76.86 GTexel/s |
| 155.5 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.46 TFLOPS |
