In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce GT 520 is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 29 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 6900% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 70 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 6900% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 13, 2011
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 520 vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
70 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 520 vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 520 vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
1%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 520 Apr 13th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 13th, 2011 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$59.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
29 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
