In Atomfall, the GeForce GT 435M is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 435M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 353% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 353% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Sep 03, 2010
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 435M vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 435M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
2.6 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
10.4 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
249.6 GFLOPS
1%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 435M Sep 3rd, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
