The GeForce GT 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6800. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 69 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 6800 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 240
Nov 17th, 2009
Average FPS
41
29%
Min 1% FPS
16
19%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
143
100%
Min 1% FPS
86
100%
Price, $
$629.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.4/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$629.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$499.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,099.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,094.99
In Stock
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 6800 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 6800 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 6800 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 240
Nov 17th, 2009
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
54.4 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
17.6 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
257.3 GFLOPS
2%
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
$80.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
69 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 4.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| 17.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| 257.3 GFLOPS | FP32 | 16.17 TFLOPS |
