Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 2792 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 69 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 41% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than GeForce GT 240 - 404 vs 287 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 16 vs 1 GB
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
FPS
404
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 240 | vs | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$80 | MSRP | $1599 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |