The GeForce GT 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 240
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 65 vs 69 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 240
Nov 17th, 2009
Average FPS
41
84%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$137.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 240
Nov 17th, 2009
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
54.4 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
17.6 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
257.3 GFLOPS
16%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
$80.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
69 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
17.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
257.3 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |