Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)

Buy for $114.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 0 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)

Buy for $114.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 0 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3444 days newer than GeForce GT 240.

Advantages of GeForce GT 240

  • Consumes up to 8% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 69 vs 75 Watts

Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 40% better in Deathloop than GeForce GT 240 - 63 vs 45 FPS
  • Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 4 vs 1 GB
Calculator background
This is a free version of Deathloop.
Deathloop

Deathloop

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Logo
GeForce GT 240

Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009


FPS

45

71%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

63

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.83/FPS

100%

Price, $

$114.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)

Buy for $114.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 0 minutes ago

Trending Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Logo
GeForce GT 240

Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Logo
GeForce GT 240

Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009


Pixel Fillrate

4.4 GPixel/s

8%

Texel Fillrate

17.6 GTexel/s

19%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Logo

GeForce GT 240

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

GeForce GTX 1650

Nov 17th, 2009Release Date
GeForce 200GenerationGeForce 16
MSRP$149
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
NonePower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
1 GBMemory
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
128-bitBus128-bit
54.4 GB/sBandwidth
550 MHzBase Clock Speed
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1665 MHz
850 MHzMemory Clock Speed

PCs Using GeForce GT 240 or GeForce GTX 1650

With selected game settings

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.