In Atomfall, the GeForce GT 220 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 4080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 58 vs 320 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
GeForce RTX 4080
- Up to 2820% faster in Atomfall – 146 vs 5 FPS
- Up to 2820% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Sep 20, 2022 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 0 GB
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce RTX 4080: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Average FPS
146 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
109 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1789.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce RTX 4080: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce RTX 4080: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 220
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
5 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
10 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
130.6 GFLOPS
0%
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
716.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
48.74 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 220 Oct 12th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 4080 Sep 20th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
58W | Power Consumption | 320W |
