In Deathloop, the GeForce GT 1010 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 1010
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 178% faster in Deathloop – 136 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 178% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jan 13, 2021
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Deathloop FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 1010 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 1010 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 1010 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 1010
Jan 13th, 2021
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
9%
Pixel Fillrate
11.74 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
23.49 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
751.6 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 1010 Jan 13th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 13th, 2021 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
