The GeForce 920MX is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 16 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920MX vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Average FPS
41
49%
Min 1% FPS
16
36%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$183.24
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$271.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$300.95
In Stock
GeForce 920MX vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920MX vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920MX vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920MX
Mar 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
7.944 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
23.83 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
508.4 GFLOPS
6%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920MX | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
16 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.944 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
| 23.83 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 508.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
