The GeForce 920M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 33 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
40
48%
Min 1% FPS
15
33%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
100%
GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
732.7 GFLOPS
6%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.632 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 30.53 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 732.7 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
