The GeForce 920M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 33 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro W6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
40
62%
Min 1% FPS
15
47%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 920M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
732.7 GFLOPS
20%
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 920M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.632 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.59 GPixel/s |
| 30.53 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.9 GTexel/s |
| 732.7 GFLOPS | FP32 | 3.58 TFLOPS |
