The GeForce 840M is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 840M
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 33 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 840M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
42
93%
Min 1% FPS
16
89%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
100%
Min 1% FPS
18
100%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
GeForce 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 840M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
16.02 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
8.992 GPixel/s
46%
Texture Fillrate
17.98 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
863.2 GFLOPS
69%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 840M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
GeForce 800M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
16.02 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
8.992 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
17.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
863.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |