The GeForce 840M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 840M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 33 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 840M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
42
66%
Min 1% FPS
16
52%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$349
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.45/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 840M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
16.02 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
8.992 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
17.98 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
863.2 GFLOPS
29%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 840M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 16.02 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 8.992 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| 17.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| 863.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
