In Atomfall, the GeForce 840M is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 840M
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 70% faster in Atomfall – 34 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 70% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Mar 12, 2014
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 30 vs 33 Watts
- Consumes up to 9% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce 840M vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 840M vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 840M vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 840M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
16.02 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
8.992 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
17.98 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
863.2 GFLOPS
32%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 840M Mar 12th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 33W | Power Consumption | 30W |
