The GeForce 830M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 830M
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 33 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce 830M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 830M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
41
91%
Min 1% FPS
16
89%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
100%
Min 1% FPS
18
100%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
GeForce 830M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 830M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 830M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 830M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
9.2 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
18.4 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
588.8 GFLOPS
47%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 830M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 9.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
| 18.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
| 588.8 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |
