In Atomfall, the GeForce 820M is much slower than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 820M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 45 vs 285 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- Up to 574% faster in Atomfall – 128 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 574% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 21, 2015
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
128 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
96 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 820M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 820M
Mar 21st, 2015
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
28.83 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
6.48 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
25.92 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
622.1 GFLOPS
1%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
44.1 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 820M Mar 21st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 21st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
45W | Power Consumption | 285W |
