In Rust, the GeForce 210 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 31 vs 575 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
GeForce RTX 5090
- Up to 438% faster in Rust – 323 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 438% faster in Rust
- Is 15 years and 3 months newer – Jan 30, 2025 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 15 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 6300% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 0 GB
- Up to 6300% more VRAM memory
Rust FPS Calculator
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
323 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
120 FPS
100%
Price, $
$3499
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
2%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
0%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
0%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1636.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 Jan 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31W | Power Consumption | 575W |
