The Arc A350M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 25 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
May 18th, 2023
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, $
$540
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.21/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$540.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$689.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$658.87
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$577.91
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$591.55
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$547.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A350M vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
15%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
May 18th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A350M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 160 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
52.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.7 GPixel/s |
105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 344.8 GTexel/s |
3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 22.06 TFLOPS |