In The Last of Us Part II, the Arc A350M is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 25 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 2433% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 3 FPS
- Up to 2433% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 6 months and 13 days newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Mar 30, 2022
- Is 6 months and 13 days newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Arc A350M vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Arc A350M vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Arc A350M vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
17%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Arc A350M Mar 30th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2022 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
