Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon Vega 3 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1788 days older than Radeon Vega 3 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Radeon Vega 3 Mobile - 520 vs 495 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
Integrated • Jan 6th, 2019
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
Integrated • Jan 6th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
4.004 GPixel/s
13%
Texel Fillrate
12.01 GTexel/s
20%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Picasso | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1001 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
