Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 56 is 557 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 64 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 28% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 56 - $239.0 vs $334.08
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dead Space than Radeon RX Vega 56 - $3.79 vs $5.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - 120 vs 210 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.22/FPS
72%
Price, $
$334.08
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $334.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 726 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
63
98%
Value, $/FPS
$3.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $239 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
51%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 14th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $279 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR6 |
2048-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
409.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1156 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1471 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |