Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Radeon RX 560

Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Radeon RX 560: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Logo
Sapphire 11304-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT PCIe 4.0 Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6

Buy for $658.47 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

AMD Radeon RX 560 Logo
VisionTek Radeon RX 560 4GB GDDR5 4M 4K Graphics Card, 4 Mini DisplayPort, 7.1 Surround Sound, PCI Express, Low-Profile GPU, ATX & SFF - 901278

Buy for $215.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 19 minutes ago

FPS Winner

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Logo
Sapphire 11304-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT PCIe 4.0 Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6

Buy for $658.47 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

AMD Radeon RX 560 Logo
VisionTek Radeon RX 560 4GB GDDR5 4M 4K Graphics Card, 4 Mini DisplayPort, 7.1 Surround Sound, PCI Express, Low-Profile GPU, ATX & SFF - 901278

Buy for $215.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 19 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms the cheaper Radeon RX 560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6800 XT is 1289 days newer than the cheaper Radeon RX 560.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

  • Performs up to 142% better in DOOM Eternal than Radeon RX 560 - 358 vs 148 FPS
  • Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 560 - 16 vs 4 GB

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 560

  • Up to 67% cheaper than Radeon RX 6800 XT - $215.9 vs $658.47
  • Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT - 75 vs 300 Watts
This is a free version of DOOM Eternal.
DOOM Eternal

DOOM Eternal

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Logo
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020


FPS

358

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$658.47

32%

FPS Winner

Sapphire 11304-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT PCIe 4.0 Gaming Graphics Card with 16GB GDDR6

Buy for $658.47 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

AMD Radeon RX 560 Logo
Radeon RX 560

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017


FPS

148

41.340782122905026%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$215.9

100%

VisionTek Radeon RX 560 4GB GDDR5 4M 4K Graphics Card, 4 Mini DisplayPort, 7.1 Surround Sound, PCI Express, Low-Profile GPU, ATX & SFF - 901278

Buy for $215.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 19 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Logo
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020

AMD Radeon RX 560 Logo
Radeon RX 560

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Logo
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020


Pixel Fillrate

288 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

648 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon RX 560 Logo
Radeon RX 560

Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017


Pixel Fillrate

20.4 GPixel/s

7.083333333333333%

Texel Fillrate

81.6 GTexel/s

12.592592592592592%

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

Oct 28th, 2020
Release DateApr 18th, 2017
Navi IIGenerationPolaris
$649MSRP
$99
1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-COutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
2x 8-pinPower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16 GB
Memory4 GB
GDDR6TypeGDDR5
256-bitBus128-bit
512 GB/s
Bandwidth112 GB/s
1825 MHz
Base Clock Speed1175 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock Speed1275 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock Speed1750 MHz

Builds Using Radeon RX 6800 XT or Radeon RX 560

DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.