Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 5300M outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 5300M is 2099 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Performs up to 34% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R7 265 - 39 vs 29 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 85 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 3 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
46.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
127.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
Mobility Radeon | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
168 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1445 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |