Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 M395X outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 M395X is 2031 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Performs up to 300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce 210 - 4 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 M395X - 31 vs 75 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
8.98876404494382%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
4.495353360708883%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |