Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 M395X outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 M395X is 427 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Radeon R9 280 - 38 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 75 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 8 vs 3 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
88%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Crystal System | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
