Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1820 days older than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than GeForce GTX 1650 - 114 vs 111 FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 75 vs 500 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
111
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1997 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
52%
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$1499 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
3x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1018 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |