Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2077 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 67 vs 59 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 41% cheaper than Radeon R9 290X - $122.99 vs $210.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R9 290X - $2.08 vs $3.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 65 vs 290 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
59
88%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
23%
AMD Radeon R9 290X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$549 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |