Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 285 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is 2324 days newer than Radeon R9 285.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- Performs up to 940% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R9 285 - 52 vs 5 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 115 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 8 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
148.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
296.6 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 285 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 Mobile |
| $249 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | None |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| 918 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1110 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1545 MHz |
| 1375 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
