Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon R7 M260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 118 days older than Radeon R7 M260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 8% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Radeon R7 M260 - 68 vs 63 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Radeon R7 M260
Mobile • Jun 11th, 2014
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 M260 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Crystal System | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
940 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
980 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
